Another One of Awan’s Theories is Corroborated!
In the mid 1990’s, Carl R. Hewitt began channeling an Ascended Master who called himself the Angel Without A Name (AWAN). Awan asked me to become his scribe, to record his body of teachings. I agreed, but did not realize at the time that it would take me 20 years to complete the task. Eventually, 4 books of Awan’s teachings were published.
Some of the concepts Awan taught took me a while to accept, and often I needed to do intense research to corroborate the validity of Awan’s statements. I became accustomed to unexpected events in my life, which usually led me to find corroborating evidence. Most often, I was the one seeking the evidence; however, on a few occasions, particularly with statements where I was convinced, I could not find corroborating evidence; the evidence actually sought me out.
The first of these occasions occurred in February 2009, when a friend of mine sent me an email about an exhibit of books that included a Hebrew Bible book censored by the Catholic Church. I documented that event on this website.
The second occasion occurred on January 16, 2026, as I browsed YouTube and discovered a video titled “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain.”
Again, the video’s information confirms Awan’s account of Jesus’s resurrection of his physical body after the crucifixion.[1]
The Shroud of Turin
“The Shroud of Turin is a 14-foot-long linen cloth, it’s three and a half feet wide, it’s made out of flax.”[2]
There is physical evidence to support the belief that the Shroud is the burial cloth of Jesus of Nazareth. The cloth has blood stains over the wounds that are consistent with the injuries of a crucified man, who was whipped. These injuries are consistent with the Gospel account in Matthew 27:57-60.
“Ever since the Shroud first appeared in history, there’s been controversy about it, and there have been questions about its authenticity. “[3] “Is it [the Shroud] really the cloth that wrapped his [Jesus’] crucified body, or is it simply a medieval forgery, a hoax perpetrated by some clever artist?”[4]
“For centuries, the Shroud of Turin has existed in a strange limbo, too religious for science, too physical for theology. A linen cloth bearing the faint front and back image of a crucified man, revered by millions, dismissed by others, and endlessly debated by historians, chemists, physicists, and skeptics alike. “[5]
“Modern science has completed hundreds of thousands of hours of detailed study and intense research on the Shroud. It is, in fact, the single most studied artifact in human history, and we know more about it today than we ever have before. And yet, the controversy still rages.”[6]
How did the Shroud Travel to Italy?
| Important Dates in the Shroud’s History[7] | |
| 1354 | The documented history of the shroud dates back to 1354, when it began to be exhibited in the new collegiate church of Lirey, a village in north-central France. |
| 1389 | The shroud was denounced as a forgery by the bishop of Troyes, Pierre d’Arcis, in 1389. |
| 1453 | It was acquired by the House of Savoy in 1453 and later deposited in a chapel in Chambéry, |
| 1532 | where it was damaged by fire in 1532. |
| 1578 | In 1578, the Savoys moved the shroud to their new capital in Turin, where it has remained ever since. |
| 1683 | Since 1683, it has been kept in the Chapel of the Holy Shroud, which was designed for that purpose by the architect Guarino Guarini and which is connected to both the royal palace and the Turin Cathedral. |
| 1983 | Ownership of the shroud passed from the House of Savoy to the Catholic Church after the death of the former king Umberto II of Italy in 1983. |
1898–Secondo Pia takes the first photograph of the Shroud
Centuries of Controversy
People who have examined the Shroud of Turin have formed numerous conflicting theories about it. For centuries, some people have claimed that the Shroud is not authentic but a medieval forgery. They believed that an artist painted it. 20th-century experts have proven that this theory is incorrect, as they found no evidence of paint or any artist’s media on the cloth.
1978-Scientists Test the Shroud of Turin
1988-Cloth from the Shroud of Turin is Carbon Dated
In 1988, the Catholic Church permitted the removal of a sample from the Shroud, which was then carbon-dated. This opened a new controversy. Scientists argued over the results of these tests. The sample was dated to 1260 A. D., rather than the 1st century.
Other Artifacts Can Help to Date the Shroud
The Pray Codex
The Budapest National Library (Az Országos Széchényi Könyvtár) houses a medieval manuscript known as the Pray Codex.
The Hungarian Pray Manuscript (Codex) is named for György Pray (1723-1801), a Jesuit scholar who studied it. The Hungarian Pray Manuscript was written between 1192 and 1195. It includes an illustration depicting Jesus being placed on his burial shroud, which features a very unusual herringbone weave, along with an identical pattern of burn holes. Both these features are found on the Shroud of Turin.[8]
The Sudarum of Oviedo
The Cathedral of San Salvador in Oviedo, Spain, was founded by King Fruela I of Asturias in 781. His son, King Alfonso II of Asturias[9] built a small chapel in the Cathedral, in 840 A. D., specifically to house a unique piece of cloth known as the Sudarium.[10]
The Sudarium (Latin for sweat cloth) is claimed to be the cloth wrapped around the head of Jesus after he died, as mentioned in the Gospel of John (20:6-7).[11]
The Sudarium is housed in the Cámara Santa, an elaborate reliquary chest with a Romanesque metal front.[12]
New Carbon Data Testing
“New tests have been done using different methods. Some scientists used x-ray analysis to look at the way the linen fibers have broken down over time. Their results were explosive. They found that the cloth is actually around 2,000 years old. This matches the time when the man in the image would have lived. It also matches the pollen found on the cloth. Researchers found dust and pollen from plants that only grow around Jerusalem. “[13]Scientists discover Shroud’s image contains 3D Information
2009 – Computers Create a 3D Image of the Shroud’s face
A Scientist Proclaims the Resurrection a Paranormal Event!
Radiation Creates the Image on the Shroud
Scientists Confirm the Radiation Theory
The scientist just mirrored Awan’s description of an explosion of light! However, Awan explained the technique Jesus used, which still baffles the scientist.
Technique that Made the Shroud’s Image
In 2010, the History Channel’s documentary “For the Face of Jesus Uncovered?” documented discoveries made in 2009 regarding the Shroud of Turin. The scientist demonstrated that the 21st-century technique of a computer scanner was crucial for creating the image on the Shroud. Then, 15 years later, a newly developed tool revealed further astonishing information about the Shroud of Turin.
2025 – AI Unlocks the Shroud’s Secrets
“What if one of the most studied objects in human history has been misunderstood? Not because we lacked faith, but because we lacked the right tools? What if the mystery wasn’t hidden in religion, but in data? What if an artificial intelligence designed to detect patterns humans routinely miss found something inside the Shroud of Turin that no artist, no forger, and no known natural process should be able to produce? And what if the reason scientists went quiet afterward wasn’t because the data was wrong, but because they didn’t know how to explain it? “[14]
“The Shroud has survived for 2,000 years, but it feels like it was designed for the 21st century. It waited in silence for us to invent computers powerful enough to read its true message. This is why the discovery is so important.[15] It’s religion and science living together on the same piece of cloth. “[16]
“For centuries, the Shroud of Turin has existed in a strange limbo, too religious for science, too physical for theology. A linen cloth bearing the faint front and back image of a crucified man, revered by millions, dismissed by others, and endlessly debated by historians, chemists, physicists, and skeptics alike.”[17]
“A team of scientists recently did something no one expected. They fed the visual data from the Shroud of Turin into a neural network originally designed to analyze deep space signals. The goal was simple, confirm that the Shroud was a medieval forgery. But that’s not what happened.”[18] “Instead, the system halted and flagged a massive anomaly. It detected a mathematically precise projection of a human body, one that doesn’t behave according to gravity. This suddenly wasn’t just a religious debate, it became a question of physics. The data suggests the figure in the Shroud didn’t simply die, it vanished. And the most unsettling part? This evidence may have been in front of us for nearly 2,000 years.”[19]
“When the AI examined it, it didn’t see artwork, it saw raw data. The neural network filtered out the visual noise and focused on the underlying structure. What appeared wasn’t a picture, but an information field.[20]An image that follows physics, but not art.”[21] “What they found is a repeating mathematical symmetry hidden beneath the image. This isn’t just a face on a sheet.”[22]
“When the AI examined the chaotic weave of the linen fibers, it stopped cold. Beneath the faint, haunting image of the man, it detected a hidden signal, a repeating mathematical symmetry. This isn’t something a medieval artist could have produced intentionally or accidentally. In simple terms, the system uncovered a digital imprint locked inside the threads themselves.“[23]
Shallow Image
“The image on the Shroud is thinner than a soap bubble. If you’d cut a thread crosswise, the inside is pure white. No pigment, no dye, no ink, no residue of liquid application. Whatever caused the image altered only the extreme surface of the fibers. Uniformly, directionlessly, without brush strokes, and without penetrating the cloth.”[24]
“… you have to look closely at the image. It’s astonishingly shallow. The discoloration exists only on the outermost surface of the linen fibers, just a few hundred nanometers deep. For comparison, a single human hair is about 80,000 nanometers thick. This image is thinner than a soap bubble. The color doesn’t soak into the fabric the way paint, dye or ink would. If you cut a thread in half, the inside remains completely white. The image sits on the surface like a scorch mark, not a stain. There are no brush strokes, no pigments, no signs of an artist’s hand.”[25]
“The artificial intelligence found that the image actually has multiple layers. It is as if the body was recorded multiple times as it moved. But the movements are so fast that they look like one image. This is called a stroboscopic effect. It suggests that the resurrection was not just a person waking up. It was a person vibrating so fast that they could pass through solid objects. If this is true, the Shroud is the only physical proof we have of a higher dimension. Everyone is looking for the man, but they should be looking at the energy.“[26]
Image on the Surface of the Body
“The AI confirmed something far stranger. The darkness of the image perfectly matches how close the cloth was to the body. Where the fabric touched the skin, the image is darker. Where it hovered farther away, the image fades. It forms a flawless mathematical map of distance.”[27]
“The computer revealed that the intensity of the image matches the exact distance from a human body to the cloth. It is a three-dimensional relief map encoded on a two-dimensional surface.[28] And get this, no artist from the Middle Ages could have known how to do that. It would be like someone in the Dark Ages trying to write computer code with a quill.“[29]
Medieval Artist Ruled Out
“This strongly suggests the image wasn’t created by a human hand pressing pigment onto cloth. For a medieval forger to pull this off, they would have needed to be a physicist, a mathematician, and a nanotechnology expert, centuries before any of those fields existed. They would have had to paint using invisible geometry.”[30]
“We are looking at an object that should not exist. It is a piece of the past that was made with the physics of the future. This leads to the question of who or what actually created such a pattern. Some wild theories suggest the image was created by a technology we do not even have yet!”[31]
The Problem With The Forger Theory
“For centuries, skeptics have argued the Shroud is a medieval fake. But as analytical resolution increases, the Forger required becomes more and more unrealistic.
To fake the Shroud, a medieval artist would need:
- Knowledge of photographic negatives
- Understanding of 3D spatial encoding
- Control over fiber-level surface chemistry
- Ability to apply blood first, image second
- A method that leaves no pigment, no binder, no residue.”[32]
As one absorbs all this information, it becomes abundantly clear that an artist living in the Middle Ages would not have the technical skills to create the shroud. What also becomes clear is that the person who created the image on the shroud had 21st or perhaps 22nd-century knowledge of physics and other sciences. How could a person living in biblical times have this advanced knowledge?
There is no way we can say with absolute certainty that Jesus was wrapped in this shroud. However, we do know, as Jesus stated himself, “The Father and I are one.” [NAB].”[33] Jesus frequently merged with “The Father,” who is also known as The ONE I AM, or the ONENESS. The ONENESS exists outside our time flow, or, to put it another way, in a timeless dimension. Therefore, the ONENESS would know of the 21st, 22nd, and even the 23rd centuries. The ONENESS would understand this advanced physics and possess the technological knowledge to guide Jesus in creating the 3D image on a 2D sheet of linen.
Other Details Found in the Shroud
Surprisingly, AI even found accurate historical evidence embedded in the shroud, but invisible to the human eye.
“It detected thousands of tiny torture marks that match ancient records with perfect accuracy. It even found traces of coins over the eyes that were minted in the year 29.”[34]
“The machine also found that the blood contains high levels of bilirubin. This is a chemical that shows up in the blood when a person has been through extreme physical trauma. Basically, it proves the man in the Shroud was a real victim of a terrible ordeal. This isn’t just a clever drawing, it is a biological record of a real human being.“[35]
Dematerialization
Awan was explaining the word ascension when he described the method Jesus used to resurrect his dead physical body. These are his exact words:
“Jesus wanted to prove to the people on earth that death is an illusion. He wanted to prove that the soul lives on, after the transition you term death. That is one of the main reasons he came back to your dimension. Jesus was the last person to have 100% of his brain functioning. This enabled him to demonstrate all the Gifts of the Spirit. After his crucifixion, Jesus’ body was placed in the tomb, and a big heavy stone was rolled in front of the tomb. They packed the same type of mud used to make bricks around the stone. The sun’s heat baked the mud tightly sealing the tomb.[36]
A few days later, Jesus’ soul returned and entered the tomb, because it vibrated on a higher frequency than the molecules of the tomb. Therefore, Jesus’ molecules easily moved between the rocky tomb’s molecules. Once inside the tomb, Jesus’ Spirit reentered his physical body. Then Jesus accelerated the molecules of his physical body, to the point that it went into light, which caused a great explosion. The explosion was so great that it broke the seal, and pushed the stone away from the tomb, leaving the entrance to the tomb open.[37] Later, when people went inside the tomb they did not find Jesus’ body, because Jesus had taken it into my dimension.”[38]
Although Awan did not use the word, dematerialization, it is what he described. Dematerialization is the disintegration and disappearance of matter.[39] Jesus dematerialized his dead physical body and took it with him to a higher dimension.
“Which brings us to the real issue, the physics of dematerialisation. The AI ignored centuries of arguments, political debates and disputed timelines. It focused only on the cloth itself. And when you look at the raw data, the conclusion is unsettling. This object does not behave like a fake painting. It behaves like something that was exposed to an immense instantaneous burst of energy.
And that leads to a final, deeply unsettling question. The puzzle is simple, but shocking. If this isn’t a painting, then something extraordinary must have happened, something that transformed a solid human body into an intense burst of light. And when matter turns into light, we’re no longer talking about art.”[40]
UV Light
“Some researchers now believe the cloth is actually a recording of a massive energy event. They call it the resurrection signal. The theory is that a burst of radiation happened and it burned the image of the body onto the cloth.”[41]
“The light came from inside the body. This is called an internal radiation source. It means the man himself was the lamp. This is why the image is so crisp on the fibers. It didn’t have to travel through the air where it could get blurry. It went straight from the skin to the linen.”[42]
“How do you create a perfectly accurate three-dimensional image on a linen cloth without damaging it at all? Right now, the most plausible scientific explanation involves a rare, invisible form of light, ultraviolet radiation.
Researchers in Italy discovered that a very specific type of UV light can alter linen fibers in exactly the same way seen on the Shroud. It changes the color only on the outermost surface of each thread without burning or penetrating deeper.
But here’s the problem, and it’s a massive one. To produce an image like this on a full-sized human form, a simple UV lamp wouldn’t even come close. You would need an energy burst equivalent to about 34 trillion watts. To put that into perspective, that’s more power than any searchlight on Earth and far beyond the lasers used in modern industry.
And it wouldn’t last long, less than 40 billionths of a second. It would also have to occur without generating heat. In effect, it would resemble a nuclear-scale event, but made entirely of light instead of fire. If the flash lasted even slightly longer, the cloth would have been incinerated. If it were even a little weaker, no image would have formed at all. And that’s what makes this so unsettling. Whatever created the image had to be impossibly precise, powerful enough to change matter, yet gentle enough to leave the cloth intact.
The conditions required for this event are so precise that they border on the impossible. Everything had to happen perfectly. No margin for error, no room for randomness. And that leads to the most radical conclusion supported by the AI’s analysis. The body wrapped inside the Shroud didn’t simply decay. It dematerialized.”[43]
Direction of Blast
“What makes this even stranger is how that energy behaved. The AI detected no evidence of an outward explosion. There was no spherical blast pattern, no chaotic dispersion like you’d expect from a violent release.”[44] “Instead, the data suggests the radiation moved in perfectly straight lines, upward and downward, aligned perpendicular to gravity. That implies a highly controlled, tightly collimated event, almost like a vertical beam rather than a blast, a linear projection of matter and energy interacting with the cloth for a fraction of a second.”[45]
Summary
“Did artificial intelligence uncover evidence of an event that defies the known laws of physics? Something truly extraordinary? Or is this the most elaborate, ingenious deception in human history? So advanced, so precise, that even modern science still can’t explain how it was done? Or maybe there’s a third possibility. Maybe we’re only beginning to glimpse a layer of reality we don’t yet understand.”[46]
“The Shroud isn’t just a relic. It is a puzzle waiting to be solved. The geometry found by the artificial intelligence matches the floor plans of ancient temples and the alignment of the stars. It suggests that whoever or whatever made this image had a deep understanding of the universe.
“They weren’t just recording a face. They were recording the architecture of reality. The ratios of the nose, the eyes, and the forehead all align with the frequencies of the human voice. This leads to the resonance theory. Some think the image was created by sound. They believe a specific frequency was played that caused the fibers to vibrate and change color. If the right note was hit, it could create a three-dimensional shape on a flat surface. This is called cymatics. The artificial intelligence found patterns in the weave that look exactly like sound waves. This would mean that the Shroud is a piece of music frozen in time. The crazy part is that the music would be the sound of a human soul leaving a body.“[47]
“If the artificial intelligence discovery is true, are we missing a key detail about our own history? The thing is, the Shroud is forcing us to look at the world differently. It is a bridge between what we can see and what we can only imagine. Whether it is a miracle, a high-tech message, or a rip in time, it is the most important object ever found.”[48]
“The geometry in the cloth isn’t just math, it’s a map of our future evolution. If we can break the final code, we might learn how to unlock these powers ourselves.”[49]
Tug of War between Lightworkers and the Forces of Darkness
We are living in turbulent times that Christians often call “the End Times.” However, the world itself is not ending; rather, the Age of Ignorance is coming to a close. We are on the cusp of entering the Age of Knowledge, where people will let go of duality and realize that every human being — and indeed all animals, plants, and everything in the universe — is actually Divine Crystalline Energy, the energy of God. No one is less worthy than another. Once we step into this new age, wars will cease, and peace and harmony will prevail.
For eons, we have lived during the Age of Ignorance, a time when some individuals gained power and exploited others. The people in power used various systems, such as governments and religions, to maintain their control over the masses. Throughout history, certain people have always opposed these controllers, speaking out and working against them.
In Biblical times, this conflict could have been described as the struggle between priests and mediums. In the 21st century, it manifests as the battle between Lightworkers and the Forces of Darkness.
I was stunned by what I discovered after completing my research on AI’s analysis of the Shroud of Turin. “By accident,” I came across an article revealing that the forces of darkness are still doing everything possible to maintain their power, even as the Earth’s and humanity’s frequencies are rising. Still, within a few short years, the forces of darkness will lose their tug-of-war with the lightworkers.
On January 16, 2026, I came across the first video discussing AI’s analysis of the Shroud of Turin. Two weeks later, I found two more videos on the same topic, offering more detailed information about AI’s findings. Then, on February 14, 2026, while browsing Yahoo News, I read Michael Natale’s article titled: “Believers See Jesus’s Face in the Shroud of Turin. A Study Now Says It’s Something Else”[50]
I chuckled before reading it, thinking that more information was crossing my path to provide further evidence of the incredible evidence embedded in the Shroud. But I was utterly disappointed and even shocked when I read the article, which claimed a scientist in Brazil had proved that “…the image on the Shroud of Turin is almost certainly a work of medieval art, rather than an authentic impression from a dying man.”
This is clearly an example of “Fake News.” AI has completely debunked the theory that the Shroud is a medieval forgery created by a clever artist. Yet Natale’s article was published on February 11, 2026, just weeks after the AI analysis was released. This is a perfect example of how controllers spread false information to reinforce their propaganda, hoping people will read it instead of the real AI findings.
AI has provided scientific proof that Jesus dematerialized his body, which then moved into a higher dimension of existence. This aligns with what Awan told us in the mid-1990s, though at the time there was no way to confirm it.
Footnotes
[1] Schwartz, Sidney; Hewit, Carl R. My Second Encounter with an Angel: Dialogues to Knowingness, Createspace Publishing, 2013. p. 71.
[2] deSimone, Aimée; Druckerman, Ken. The Real Face of Jesus?: The History Channel. NY: A&E Television Networks, 2010. 0:04:03 – 0:04:10.
[3] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube. Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:00:00 – 0:00:09.
[4] Marino, Joseph G. “Welcome to the Shroud of Turin Website.” Shroud.com. 13 February 2022. Web. 18 January 2026. < https://www.shroud.com/>.
[5] DarkMatter404. “The Pattern AI Found on the Shroud of Turin Shouldn’t Exist.” YouTube. 7 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC_-VXisNSc>. 0:00:35 – 0:01:00.
[6] Marino, Joseph G. “Welcome to the Shroud of Turin Website.” Shroud.com. 13 February 2022. Web. 18 January 2026. < https://www.shroud.com/>.
[7] “Shroud of Turin.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 18 January 2026. <https://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Shroud_of_Turin
[8] “Pray Codex.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 09 February 2026. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pray_Codex>.
[9] “Sudarium of Oviedo.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 11 February 2026. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oviedo_Cathedral>.
[10] “Oviedo Cathedral.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 11 February 2026. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo>.
[11] “Oviedo Cathedral.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 11 February 2026. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo>.
[12] “Oviedo Cathedral.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 11 February 2026. <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sudarium_of_Oviedo>.
[13] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:07:09 – 0:07:38.
[14] DarkMatter404. “The Pattern AI Found on the Shroud of Turin Shouldn’t Exist.” YouTube. 7 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC_-VXisNSc>. 0:00:00 – 0:00:35.
[15] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:04:47 – 0:05:03.
[16] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:00:00 – 0:00:04.
[17] DarkMatter404. “The Pattern AI Found on the Shroud of Turin Shouldn’t Exist.” YouTube. 7 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC_-VXisNSc>. 0:00:35 – 0:01:00.
[18] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:00:09- 0:00:28.
[19] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:00:28 – 0:00:57.
[20] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:02:36 – 0:02:51.
[21] DarkMatter404. “The Pattern AI Found on the Shroud of Turin Shouldn’t Exist.” YouTube. 7 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC_-VXisNSc>. 0:03:58 – 0:04:02.
[22] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:00:15 – 0:00:22.
[23] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. “ YouTube. Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:01:14 – 0:01:39.
[24] DarkMatter404. “The Pattern AI Found on the Shroud of Turin Shouldn’t Exist.” YouTube. 7 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC_-VXisNSc>. 0:02:22 – 0:02:46.
[25] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. “ YouTube. Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:01:42 - 0:02:20.
[26] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:14:24 – 0:15:00.
[27] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:03:10 – 0:03:30.
[28] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:00:52 – 0:01:06.
[29] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:01:06 – 0:01:17.
[30] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:03:48- 0:04:10.
[31] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:03:22 – 0:03:41.
[32] DarkMatter404. “The Pattern AI Found on the Shroud of Turin Shouldn’t Exist.” YouTube. 7 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uC_-VXisNSc>. 0:08:15 – 0:08:49.
[33] Catholic Biblical Association of America. The New American Bible. NY: P. J. Kennedy & Sons, 1970. New Testament. p. 146.
[34] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:02:58 – 0:03:08.
[35] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:16:47 – 0:17:08.
[36] Matthew 27:66, Mark 15:46.
[37] Mark 16:4, Luke 24:2, John 20:1.
[38] Schwartz, Sidney; Hewit, Carl R. My Second Encounter with an Angel: Dialogues to Knowingness, Createspace Publishing, 2013. p. 71.
[39] Blunsdon, Norman. A Popular Dictionary of Spiritualism. NY: Citadel Press, 1962. p. 58.
[40] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:11:20 – 0:12:08.
[41] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:02:18 – 0:02:34.
[42] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:13:28 – 0:13:49.
[43] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:12:23 – 0:14:16.
[44] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:14:55 – 0:15:09.
[45] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:15:09 - 0:15:31.
[46] Mysteries Decoded. “AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain. ” YouTube.Dec. 30, 2025. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAE7Ob9DH MA>. 0:17:02 - 0:17:29.
[47] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:18:34 – 0:19:21.
[48] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:21:43 – 0:22:09.
[49] KolaDepth. “AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math.” YouTube. Jan 16, 2026. Web. 14 Feb 2026. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uKjgiX kPXDs>. 0:22:34 – 0:22:45.
[50] Natale, Michael. “Believers See Jesus’s Face in the Shroud of Turin. A Study Now Says It’s Something Else.” Yahoo. 11 February 2026. Web. 14 February 2026. <https://www.yahoo. com/news/articles/believers-see-jesus-face-shroud-173100189.html>.
Videos
To view:
The Real Face of Jesus?
To view:
AI Found Something Impossible in the Shroud of Turin — Scientists Are Terrified to Explain.
To view:
AI Decoded the Shroud of Turin And Found a Resurrection Written in Math
